@Psychgirl211: And we don't have complete "bo...
@Psychgirl211
8 views
May 11, 2025
1
And we don't have complete "body autonomy" or freedom to "make choices" as we wish.
If she 'identified' as blind or disabled, nobody would cut her optic nerves or sever her spinal column simply because she demanded it.
We are not legally permitted to use certain narcotics.
We are obliged to get most medicines on prescription.
We have to wear seatbelts.
We cannot drink and drive.
We have to wear helmets if we ride a motorbike, etc.
The argument that we have "body autonomy" and therefore can inflict 'GAC' on ourselves and others is completely fallacious.
It is trotted out to defend the indefensible.
If she 'identified' as blind or disabled, nobody would cut her optic nerves or sever her spinal column simply because she demanded it.
We are not legally permitted to use certain narcotics.
We are obliged to get most medicines on prescription.
We have to wear seatbelts.
We cannot drink and drive.
We have to wear helmets if we ride a motorbike, etc.
The argument that we have "body autonomy" and therefore can inflict 'GAC' on ourselves and others is completely fallacious.
It is trotted out to defend the indefensible.
View Tweet