@DrJackKruse: King Edward the VIII in 1936 i...
@DrJackKruse
41 views
Jan 03, 2025
1
King Edward the VIII in 1936 is the key to understanding this story of the modern day Middle East. The conservative in Britain at that time however, had another agenda for 700K. Churchill could have avoided the War. Weitzman and Churchill meetings show why he was the biggest criminal in the 20th century.
View Tweet
2
2. The Focus Group that built the Nazi's from the right wing of British politics was not known until historians unearth these links in 1963. This is why the British Zionists on the right had protection for so long. Churchill was their paid actor in this game from 1936 onward. He did the Bidding of the abdicated King and his supporters on the right in British Parliment who were behind the 1917 Balfour declaration. jstor.org/stable/40664148
3
3. Know your history not the versions written by the victors: The first Focus luncheon attended by Churchill had other guests including Norman Angell, Margaret Bondfield, Hugh Dalton, Philip Guedalla, Julian Huxley, Oliver Locker-Lampson, Duncan Sandys and Wickham Steed.
The group drew much support from the ranks of the liberal internationalists, such as Angell: others were Robert Cecil, David Davies of the New Commonwealth Society, Gilbert Murray, and the politicians Austen Chamberlain, Philip Noel-Baker, Eleanor Rathbone and Arthur Salter.
This shows you this was not a jewish issue. It is was British- zionist issue born out of the Balfour declaration over 20 years in Britain supported by King George, Edward the VIII's father. Neither of whom are jewish. They were zionists as well.
CITES
1. Gottlieb, Julie V. (7 February 2016). 'Guilty Women', Foreign Policy, and Appeasement in Inter-War Britain. Springer. p. 309 note 41. ISBN 978-1-137-31660-8.
2. Pugh, M. (28 September 2012). Liberal Internationalism: The Interwar Movement for Peace in Britain. Springer. p. 1936 note 78. ISBN 978-1-137-29194-3.
The group drew much support from the ranks of the liberal internationalists, such as Angell: others were Robert Cecil, David Davies of the New Commonwealth Society, Gilbert Murray, and the politicians Austen Chamberlain, Philip Noel-Baker, Eleanor Rathbone and Arthur Salter.
This shows you this was not a jewish issue. It is was British- zionist issue born out of the Balfour declaration over 20 years in Britain supported by King George, Edward the VIII's father. Neither of whom are jewish. They were zionists as well.
CITES
1. Gottlieb, Julie V. (7 February 2016). 'Guilty Women', Foreign Policy, and Appeasement in Inter-War Britain. Springer. p. 309 note 41. ISBN 978-1-137-31660-8.
2. Pugh, M. (28 September 2012). Liberal Internationalism: The Interwar Movement for Peace in Britain. Springer. p. 1936 note 78. ISBN 978-1-137-29194-3.
4
4. Rathbone like Violet Bonham Carter had belonged to the BNSANC; but unlike her never became one of Churchill's trusted inner circle, at the heart of the "Focus Group". Another difference was that Bonham Carter wrote for Willi Münzenberg's Die Zukunft.
Archie Sinclair, the Liberal Party leader, was a close personal friend of Churchill. He hung back initially, wary of political entanglements, but joined the Focus by autumn 1936.
On December 3rd, 1936 the Focus Group, with other pro-zionist groups, held a large rally in the Albert Hall, at which Churchill spoke, under the "Arms and the Covenant" umbrella: support for British re-armament and the Covenant of the League of Nations. On that day the Abdication Crisis started because of the King's support for Hitler.'s Germany Churchill actually defended the King's position in Parliament on December 13, 1936. when you understand these links you understand the King George and the rothschild's propped up Nazi Germany to draw the US and USSR back to war to reclaim the allodial title the Royal lost in 1774 and 1917. This is the most misunderstood history of the 20th century how Nazism was born inside the Royal family and their bankers. Churchill was the bankers and right wingers in Parliment, useful idiot. The Royal family press corp has tried to bury this story for 90 years. They were the architects of the Nazism.
CITES
1. Pennybacker, Susan D. (2009). From Scottsboro to Munich: Race and Political Culture in 1930s Britain. Princeton University Press. p. 226. ISBN 9780691141862.
2. Groot, Gerard J. De (1993). Liberal Crusader: The Life of Sir Archibald Sinclair. C. Hurst. p. 121. ISBN 978-1-85065-182-6.
3. McKinstry, Leo (3 October 2019). Attlee and Churchill: Allies in War, Adversaries in Peace. Atlantic Books. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-78649-574-7.
4. "Edward VIII: Abdication timeline". 29 January 2003.
5. Groot, Gerard J. De (1993). Liberal Crusader: The Life of Sir Archibald Sinclair. C. Hurst. p. 124. ISBN 978-1-85065-182-6.
Archie Sinclair, the Liberal Party leader, was a close personal friend of Churchill. He hung back initially, wary of political entanglements, but joined the Focus by autumn 1936.
On December 3rd, 1936 the Focus Group, with other pro-zionist groups, held a large rally in the Albert Hall, at which Churchill spoke, under the "Arms and the Covenant" umbrella: support for British re-armament and the Covenant of the League of Nations. On that day the Abdication Crisis started because of the King's support for Hitler.'s Germany Churchill actually defended the King's position in Parliament on December 13, 1936. when you understand these links you understand the King George and the rothschild's propped up Nazi Germany to draw the US and USSR back to war to reclaim the allodial title the Royal lost in 1774 and 1917. This is the most misunderstood history of the 20th century how Nazism was born inside the Royal family and their bankers. Churchill was the bankers and right wingers in Parliment, useful idiot. The Royal family press corp has tried to bury this story for 90 years. They were the architects of the Nazism.
CITES
1. Pennybacker, Susan D. (2009). From Scottsboro to Munich: Race and Political Culture in 1930s Britain. Princeton University Press. p. 226. ISBN 9780691141862.
2. Groot, Gerard J. De (1993). Liberal Crusader: The Life of Sir Archibald Sinclair. C. Hurst. p. 121. ISBN 978-1-85065-182-6.
3. McKinstry, Leo (3 October 2019). Attlee and Churchill: Allies in War, Adversaries in Peace. Atlantic Books. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-78649-574-7.
4. "Edward VIII: Abdication timeline". 29 January 2003.
5. Groot, Gerard J. De (1993). Liberal Crusader: The Life of Sir Archibald Sinclair. C. Hurst. p. 124. ISBN 978-1-85065-182-6.
5
5. The British Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi Council (BNSANC) was founded in 1934 under King George, with Walter Citrine as president. A parallel World Non-Sectarian Anti-Nazi Council to Champion Human Rights (WNSANCHR) was founded at the same time. These organizations were developments from the Non-Sectarian Zionist League founded by Samuel Untermyer to institute the 1933 anti-Nazi boycott.
The establishment in November 1934 of the WNSANCHR was recognition of the need of a broader base for a boycott, and had support from 13 countries.
Between around 1935 and 1937 it was a vehicle for Churchill's attempts to form a cross-party alliance against Chamberlin's appeasement of German rule. The group behind it used the title Focus in Defence of Freedom and Peace, which is why it was known as the Focus Group.
By the end of 1937, Murray was commenting to Cecil on the convergence of the LNU's position with Churchill's. Right wing British Parliment wanted Chamberlin destroyed and removed and Churchill elevated to run the program of the zionists in the pre WW2 era. Churchill was to do all he could for those who paid him to get FDR into WW2 as soon as possible.
Invited to a group lunch in March 1938, Harold Nicolson described it as "one of Winston's things he was paid for", comprising Angell, Cecil and Steed with Walter Layton of the News Chronicle et al.
On September 29th, 1938, the day before the Munich Agreement was signed, Churchill convened the Focus Group for lunch at the Savoy Hotel, and again at 7pm to have a minatory telegram signed to go to Neville Chamberlain.
Clement Attlee declined to have his name added, on the telephone. Among the signers were Cecil, Sinclair and Lord Lloyd.
The story that Anthony Eden also declined to add his name is rejected by Eden's biographer Robert Rhodes James; who attributes the account to Violet Bonham Carter, as someone who disliked Eden and took a bleak view of his motivations.
CITES
1. Stray, Christopher, ed. (12 July 2007). Gilbert Murray Reassessed: Hellenism, Theatre, and International Politics. OUP Oxford. p. 236. ISBN 978-0-19-920879-1.
2. Nicolson, Harold (1966). Diaries and Letters: 1930-1939. Collins. p. 327. ISBN 978-0-00-211316-8.
3. Manchester, William (6 November 2012). The Last Lion: Volume 2: Winston Spencer Churchill: Alone, 1932-1940. Little, Brown. p. 341. ISBN 978-0-316-24487-9.
4. James, Robert Rhodes (1987). Anthony Eden. Papermac. p. 211 note. ISBN 978-0-333-45503-6.
The establishment in November 1934 of the WNSANCHR was recognition of the need of a broader base for a boycott, and had support from 13 countries.
Between around 1935 and 1937 it was a vehicle for Churchill's attempts to form a cross-party alliance against Chamberlin's appeasement of German rule. The group behind it used the title Focus in Defence of Freedom and Peace, which is why it was known as the Focus Group.
By the end of 1937, Murray was commenting to Cecil on the convergence of the LNU's position with Churchill's. Right wing British Parliment wanted Chamberlin destroyed and removed and Churchill elevated to run the program of the zionists in the pre WW2 era. Churchill was to do all he could for those who paid him to get FDR into WW2 as soon as possible.
Invited to a group lunch in March 1938, Harold Nicolson described it as "one of Winston's things he was paid for", comprising Angell, Cecil and Steed with Walter Layton of the News Chronicle et al.
On September 29th, 1938, the day before the Munich Agreement was signed, Churchill convened the Focus Group for lunch at the Savoy Hotel, and again at 7pm to have a minatory telegram signed to go to Neville Chamberlain.
Clement Attlee declined to have his name added, on the telephone. Among the signers were Cecil, Sinclair and Lord Lloyd.
The story that Anthony Eden also declined to add his name is rejected by Eden's biographer Robert Rhodes James; who attributes the account to Violet Bonham Carter, as someone who disliked Eden and took a bleak view of his motivations.
CITES
1. Stray, Christopher, ed. (12 July 2007). Gilbert Murray Reassessed: Hellenism, Theatre, and International Politics. OUP Oxford. p. 236. ISBN 978-0-19-920879-1.
2. Nicolson, Harold (1966). Diaries and Letters: 1930-1939. Collins. p. 327. ISBN 978-0-00-211316-8.
3. Manchester, William (6 November 2012). The Last Lion: Volume 2: Winston Spencer Churchill: Alone, 1932-1940. Little, Brown. p. 341. ISBN 978-0-316-24487-9.
4. James, Robert Rhodes (1987). Anthony Eden. Papermac. p. 211 note. ISBN 978-0-333-45503-6.
6
6. Chamberlain's reputation pre-1940 was stellar and he had high regard because Britain was not ready for war in 1939-40. If you are an autodidact you'll see historians and history books influenced by the Royal Family and Churchill tarbished his legacy during WW2. It was entirely eroded by books such as Guilty Men, published in July 1940, which blamed Chamberlain and his associates for the Munich accord and for "allegedly" failing to prepare the country for war. Chamberlain predecessor Stanley Bladwin was to blame on a lack of preparation due to the bankers causing the Great Depression. Most manufactured historians loyal to the Crown in the generation following Chamberlain's death held similar views, led by Churchill in The Gathering Storm. This is how the real events pre WW2 where changed to fit a narrative that the Royal Family, their bankers, and the Popes did not prop up th eNazis. They created the Nazi's as a pretext for regaining America and Russia back. They failed miserably and the zionists of Britain used the jews as ther pawn in this war game. Churchill was a bigger criminal than General Groves was in the USA. FDR was not far behind either one, in my view either.
7
7. There is plenty more on the British royal family's various connections to the Nazis:
The connection begins with Charles Edward, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, a grandson of Queen Victoria pictured below by Getty Images.
The connection begins with Charles Edward, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, a grandson of Queen Victoria pictured below by Getty Images.
8
8. Prince Charles Edward was born in Surrey to Prince Leopold (Queen Victoria and Prince Albert's eighth son) and Princess Helen of Waldeck and Pyrmont. The future Edward VII, then the Prince of Wales, was one of his godparents, and the future George V was his first cousin.
In 1900, a 16-year-old Prince Charles Edward inherited the Dukedom of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in Germany, and started going by Karl-Eduard (or, in English, Carl Edward or Carl Eduard).
In 1900, a 16-year-old Prince Charles Edward inherited the Dukedom of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in Germany, and started going by Karl-Eduard (or, in English, Carl Edward or Carl Eduard).
9
9. "It was a very great heartbreak for my mother that my brother had to succeed to Coburg. 'I have always tried to bring Charlie up as a good Englishman,' she once said, 'and now I have to turn him into a good German,'" his sister, Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone, wrote in her memoirs For My Grandchildren.
When World War I broke out, he decided to support the German Empire, and served in the German army. Because of this, he was deemed a traitor and King George V removed him from the Most Noble Order of the Garter and stripped him of his British royal titles. In 1918, following the German Revolution, he lost his German titles—but not his wealth or property. (By this point, he was also exiled from the UK.) Here he is below in his Nazi uniform.
When World War I broke out, he decided to support the German Empire, and served in the German army. Because of this, he was deemed a traitor and King George V removed him from the Most Noble Order of the Garter and stripped him of his British royal titles. In 1918, following the German Revolution, he lost his German titles—but not his wealth or property. (By this point, he was also exiled from the UK.) Here he is below in his Nazi uniform.
10
10. Prince Harry did the very same thing at friends birthday party in 2005. A copy of the New York Post featuring a "Royal Nazi" headline, January 13, 2005. When most people saw this headline in 2005 they had no idea why he did. He did because his family has done many times before.
11
11. In 1922, Karl-Eduard von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha met Adolf Hitler, and in 1933, he joined the Nazi Party. He soon rose in the ranks, and by 1936, he obtained the rank of 'Obergruppenführer,' or senior group leader. The same year, he went to Sandringham for King George V's funeral, and Hitler instructed him to report back on his family ----> Both King George V & Edward VIII was Hitler's partner already by that time because of the action of Zionist loan to Churchill for 700K. The Royal family was using Churchill to set up the fall of Chamberlin.
Karl-Eduard became president of the German Red Cross in 1933, and was extremely involved with the Nazi government during World War II. Following the war, the American Military Government in Bavaria placed him under house arrest, and then he was imprisoned until 1946 and charged with crimes against humanity, and subsequently fined by a Denazification court. He died in 1954 at age 69 never punished by Nuremberg because he was a royal.
Karl-Eduard became president of the German Red Cross in 1933, and was extremely involved with the Nazi government during World War II. Following the war, the American Military Government in Bavaria placed him under house arrest, and then he was imprisoned until 1946 and charged with crimes against humanity, and subsequently fined by a Denazification court. He died in 1954 at age 69 never punished by Nuremberg because he was a royal.
12
12. The most famous British royal sympathetic to the Nazis was King Edward III. The Royal narrative on his abdication is to blame his wife, Wallis Simpson. This was a false flag.
The real problem is that he was a Nazi. Shortly after Edward VIII ascension, the German ambassador to the UK, Leopold von Hoesch, wrote to Berlin, "King Edward, quite generally, feels warm sympathy for Germany. I have become convinced during frequent, often quite lengthy, talks with him that his sympathies are deep-rooted and strong enough to withstand the contrary influences to which they are not seldom exposed."
In 1997, former U.S. Foreign Service officer Paul Sweet published "The Windsor File," wherein he wrote, "His pro-German feelings frequently found expression in indiscreet remarks that were not only insensitive to the brutalities of the Nazi regime but critical of 'slip-shod democracy.' In July 1933, he told former Kaiser Wilhelm II’s grandson, Prince Louis Ferdinand, that it was 'no business of ours to interfere in Germany’s internal affairs either re Jews or re anything else.' 'Dictators are very popular these days,' Edward VIII had added. 'We might want one in England before long.'
Yet, during his short tenure as monarch, he was deeply sympathetic to the Germans. In December 1936, Conservative MP Henry "Chips" Channon wrote in his diary Edward "is going the dictator way and is pro-German, against Russia and against too much slipshod democracy. I shouldn't be surprised if he aimed at making himself a mild dictator—a difficult enough task for an English King."
He wanted this route because he and his Dad were trying to recpature America and the USSR for the crown. It was always about allodial title.
The real problem is that he was a Nazi. Shortly after Edward VIII ascension, the German ambassador to the UK, Leopold von Hoesch, wrote to Berlin, "King Edward, quite generally, feels warm sympathy for Germany. I have become convinced during frequent, often quite lengthy, talks with him that his sympathies are deep-rooted and strong enough to withstand the contrary influences to which they are not seldom exposed."
In 1997, former U.S. Foreign Service officer Paul Sweet published "The Windsor File," wherein he wrote, "His pro-German feelings frequently found expression in indiscreet remarks that were not only insensitive to the brutalities of the Nazi regime but critical of 'slip-shod democracy.' In July 1933, he told former Kaiser Wilhelm II’s grandson, Prince Louis Ferdinand, that it was 'no business of ours to interfere in Germany’s internal affairs either re Jews or re anything else.' 'Dictators are very popular these days,' Edward VIII had added. 'We might want one in England before long.'
Yet, during his short tenure as monarch, he was deeply sympathetic to the Germans. In December 1936, Conservative MP Henry "Chips" Channon wrote in his diary Edward "is going the dictator way and is pro-German, against Russia and against too much slipshod democracy. I shouldn't be surprised if he aimed at making himself a mild dictator—a difficult enough task for an English King."
He wanted this route because he and his Dad were trying to recpature America and the USSR for the crown. It was always about allodial title.
13
13. In summer 1937, soon after their wedding, the Windsors traveled to Nazi Germany, where they met many leaders—including Hitler himself, Goering, Himmler, and Goebbels.
As Denis Judd wrote in his biography of King George VI, "The Duke and Duchess waxed enthusiastic about what they saw in Nazi Germany, particularly praising workers' houses and conditions in the factories, hospitals, and youth camps."
The Duke of Windsor, reportedly, gave the Hitler salute on at least two occasions. The New York Times reported, "Before tea, Hitler showed his guests the house and grounds. They stood for some time on the terrace looking down into Austria, with the border town of Salzburg framed between the mountains."
This is the history the Zionist do not want known. Edward VIII basically announced their charade to the world and they wanted it covert.
As Denis Judd wrote in his biography of King George VI, "The Duke and Duchess waxed enthusiastic about what they saw in Nazi Germany, particularly praising workers' houses and conditions in the factories, hospitals, and youth camps."
The Duke of Windsor, reportedly, gave the Hitler salute on at least two occasions. The New York Times reported, "Before tea, Hitler showed his guests the house and grounds. They stood for some time on the terrace looking down into Austria, with the border town of Salzburg framed between the mountains."
This is the history the Zionist do not want known. Edward VIII basically announced their charade to the world and they wanted it covert.
14
14. Two years later, in a speech from Verdun, France, the former King called for appeasement to go easy on Hitler.
During World War II, however, the Duke of Windsor left Paris for Biarritz, France, then for Spain and Libson, Portugal. While he was in Spain and Portugal, he was open about being against the war. Viscount Caldecote, a member of Churchill's cabinet, warned him that the Duke "is well-known to be pro-Nazi and he may become a center of intrigue."
In fact, the German foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, wrote to his ambassador in Madrid, "Germany is determined to force England to peace by every means of power and upon this happening would be prepared to accommodate any desire expressed by the Duke, especially with a view to the assumption of the English throne by the Duke and Duchess." Essentially, if Germany defeated England, they would reinstall Edward on the British throne. Awake yet?
So, what was Churchill's solution to the Nazi King? Get the Duke of Windsor out of Europe. He was appointed Governor of the Bahamas, where he lived with Wallis until 1945. Out of sight was out of mind for the zionists.
During World War II, however, the Duke of Windsor left Paris for Biarritz, France, then for Spain and Libson, Portugal. While he was in Spain and Portugal, he was open about being against the war. Viscount Caldecote, a member of Churchill's cabinet, warned him that the Duke "is well-known to be pro-Nazi and he may become a center of intrigue."
In fact, the German foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, wrote to his ambassador in Madrid, "Germany is determined to force England to peace by every means of power and upon this happening would be prepared to accommodate any desire expressed by the Duke, especially with a view to the assumption of the English throne by the Duke and Duchess." Essentially, if Germany defeated England, they would reinstall Edward on the British throne. Awake yet?
So, what was Churchill's solution to the Nazi King? Get the Duke of Windsor out of Europe. He was appointed Governor of the Bahamas, where he lived with Wallis until 1945. Out of sight was out of mind for the zionists.
15
15. The Marburg Files of 1957 revealed the Duke's communication with Nazis. This is something the royal have tried to bury ever since.
Prince Harry's grandmother also got into the Nazi game.
In 2015, British tabloid The Sun published a 17 second black-and-white video clip that shows a young Princess Elizabeth offering a Nazi salute in 1933. The Sun says the film shows Edward VIII showing Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret how to do the salute. Buckingham Palace said it was "disappointing that film, shot eight decades ago... has been obtained and exploited." BUT THEY NEVER refuted it.
thesun.co.uk/archives/news/…
Prince Harry's grandmother also got into the Nazi game.
In 2015, British tabloid The Sun published a 17 second black-and-white video clip that shows a young Princess Elizabeth offering a Nazi salute in 1933. The Sun says the film shows Edward VIII showing Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret how to do the salute. Buckingham Palace said it was "disappointing that film, shot eight decades ago... has been obtained and exploited." BUT THEY NEVER refuted it.
thesun.co.uk/archives/news/…
16
16. So when I say the word zionist to me = British right wing polliticians and the ROYAL Family of Britain and their bankers. They are the real crimals behind both WW1 and WW2.
King Charles is one of them and one of the bigger criminal elements involved with the WEF and Council of Foreign Relations in the USA.
King Charles is one of them and one of the bigger criminal elements involved with the WEF and Council of Foreign Relations in the USA.
17
17. Prince Philip, King Charles Father, had four sisters, all of whom married members of the German aristocracy—three of those men became Nazis. (One sister, Princess Theodora married Berthold, Margrave of Baden; they tried to keep their distance from Nazism.) They all married before he married Queen Elizabeth, and thus became a part of the royal family, but the connection is still worth noting. Nazi's are everywhere you look in the Royal lineage.
His eldest sister, Princess Margarita, married Gottfried, the 8th Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg—a German aristocrat who joined the Nazi party and served in World War II. He was involved in Operation Valkyrie, the plot to assassinate Hitler in 1944.
His eldest sister, Princess Margarita, married Gottfried, the 8th Prince of Hohenlohe-Langenburg—a German aristocrat who joined the Nazi party and served in World War II. He was involved in Operation Valkyrie, the plot to assassinate Hitler in 1944.
18
18. Princess Cecilie, another sister, married German aristocrat Georg Donatus, Hereditary Grand Duke of Hesse. They joined the Nazis in May 1937, but died in a plane crash months later. At her funeral, Prince Philip marched with their relatives who wore Nazi uniforms. You cannot make this shit up folks. You have to know your history or believe the history books the Royals paid for.
His youngest sister, Princess Sophie, married Prince Christoph of Hesse, an Oberführer in the Nazi Party and a director in the Third Reich's Ministry of Air Forces. Sophie said in her memoir of Hitler, "I have to say here, that, although Chri [Prince Chrisoph] and I changed our political view fundamentally some years later, we were impressed by this charming and seemingly modest man, and by his plans to change and improve the situation in Germany." Straight from their mouths..........
To this day zionist protect their legacy because they were all on the same team in 1933. -----> Philip, notably, served for the British during World War II, and his mother, Princess Alice of Greece is recognized as a "Righteous Among Nations" by Israel's Holocaust Museum, Yad Vashem, for sheltering a Jewish family during the war. -----> Pure Bernays propaganda for the consumption of idiots.
His youngest sister, Princess Sophie, married Prince Christoph of Hesse, an Oberführer in the Nazi Party and a director in the Third Reich's Ministry of Air Forces. Sophie said in her memoir of Hitler, "I have to say here, that, although Chri [Prince Chrisoph] and I changed our political view fundamentally some years later, we were impressed by this charming and seemingly modest man, and by his plans to change and improve the situation in Germany." Straight from their mouths..........
To this day zionist protect their legacy because they were all on the same team in 1933. -----> Philip, notably, served for the British during World War II, and his mother, Princess Alice of Greece is recognized as a "Righteous Among Nations" by Israel's Holocaust Museum, Yad Vashem, for sheltering a Jewish family during the war. -----> Pure Bernays propaganda for the consumption of idiots.
19
19. Anyone who thinks the word zionist is jewish is a retard. It is more British than jewish. the Royal Family has used it for cover for 100 yrs since 1917.
KNOW THE HISTORY YOU NEVER LEARNED
The Marburg Files, also known as the Windsor Files or Duke of Windsor Files, are a series of top-secret documents discovered in Germany during May 1945 near the Harz Mountains and compiled at Marburg Castle, Hesse.
The documents considered the most damning for the British royal family were among his final communications with the Nazis before his departure to the Bahamas, in which the Duke encouraged relentless bombing attacks on the United Kingdom in a bid to force the British government to begin peace negotiations. you cannot make this up people. King Edward VIII was OK in bombing his own people to gain control for Germany.
KNOW THE HISTORY YOU NEVER LEARNED
The Marburg Files, also known as the Windsor Files or Duke of Windsor Files, are a series of top-secret documents discovered in Germany during May 1945 near the Harz Mountains and compiled at Marburg Castle, Hesse.
The documents considered the most damning for the British royal family were among his final communications with the Nazis before his departure to the Bahamas, in which the Duke encouraged relentless bombing attacks on the United Kingdom in a bid to force the British government to begin peace negotiations. you cannot make this up people. King Edward VIII was OK in bombing his own people to gain control for Germany.
20
20. Around 400 tons of material was exhumed by the United States military and transported to Marburg Castle for review. I read most of of it over 25 years ago.
Caroline Redmond (12 November 2018). "The Marburg Files Revealed Former British King Edward VIII's Nazi Ties – And The U.K. Tried To Cover It Up". Retrieved 25 January 2021.
Caroline Redmond (12 November 2018). "The Marburg Files Revealed Former British King Edward VIII's Nazi Ties – And The U.K. Tried To Cover It Up". Retrieved 25 January 2021.
21
21. Upon inspection of the documents by Americans and the British, at least 60 documents appeared to contain DIRECT correspondence between the Duke of Windsor and the Nazi German high command.
American diplomats examined the contents before relaying a mix of original drafts and replicas to the British government.
UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill discussed the files with King George VI, who insisted the files be suppressed and never released to the public.
GEE, I WONDER WHY?
Because his family created the holocaust. We were all lied too since 1945 about really what was behind the rise of Hitler. It was the Royal Family and their bankers.
The entire collection was sent to the United Kingdom in 1948 and housed at Whaddon Hall, Buckinghamshire.
CITES
1. Caroline Redmond (12 November 2018). "The Marburg Files Revealed Former British King Edward VIII's Nazi Ties – And The U.K. Tried To Cover It Up". Retrieved 25 January 2021.
2. Holland, Brynn (20 December 2017). "Watching The Crown? Here Are the Real Facts You Need to Know". History.com. A&E Television Networks.
3. Kent, George (1961). "The German Foreign Ministry's Archives at Whaddon Hall, 1948-58". American Archivist. 24 (1): 43–54. doi:10.17723/aarc.24.1.w43046451p884252.
4. "German Foreign Ministry and Italian documents 1867-1945 captured by the British". The National Archives of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 14 August2018.
American diplomats examined the contents before relaying a mix of original drafts and replicas to the British government.
UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill discussed the files with King George VI, who insisted the files be suppressed and never released to the public.
GEE, I WONDER WHY?
Because his family created the holocaust. We were all lied too since 1945 about really what was behind the rise of Hitler. It was the Royal Family and their bankers.
The entire collection was sent to the United Kingdom in 1948 and housed at Whaddon Hall, Buckinghamshire.
CITES
1. Caroline Redmond (12 November 2018). "The Marburg Files Revealed Former British King Edward VIII's Nazi Ties – And The U.K. Tried To Cover It Up". Retrieved 25 January 2021.
2. Holland, Brynn (20 December 2017). "Watching The Crown? Here Are the Real Facts You Need to Know". History.com. A&E Television Networks.
3. Kent, George (1961). "The German Foreign Ministry's Archives at Whaddon Hall, 1948-58". American Archivist. 24 (1): 43–54. doi:10.17723/aarc.24.1.w43046451p884252.
4. "German Foreign Ministry and Italian documents 1867-1945 captured by the British". The National Archives of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 14 August2018.
22
22. British, French and American historians CENSORED THIS DATA FOR YEARS and then agreed to work together from 1946 in hope of releasing only documents that they felt were essential to release.
A small batch was released in 1954, before the entire volume was forced into publication in 1957 with further files released in 1996 at the Public Record Office in Kew.
So when i use the term zionist you know I am referencing the British Criminals in the Royal family and the loyalists to them embedded in American government. AIPAC ususally supports them as the epaulet I look for that goes all the way back to the Marburg Files.
A small batch was released in 1954, before the entire volume was forced into publication in 1957 with further files released in 1996 at the Public Record Office in Kew.
So when i use the term zionist you know I am referencing the British Criminals in the Royal family and the loyalists to them embedded in American government. AIPAC ususally supports them as the epaulet I look for that goes all the way back to the Marburg Files.
23
23. Now you know why this picture allows a non Royal to touch a Royal which breaks the traditions they are suppose revere. They are partners in BIGGEST CRIMES OF THE 20th CENTURY End of Lesson for @eric_novack
View Tweet
24
24. KNOW YOUR HISTORY AND HOW IT ALL BEGAN BEFORE YOU TOSS A STONE MY WAY.
Immediately following Britain's declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914, it began to consider the future of Palestine. Within two months a memorandum was circulated to the War Cabinet by a Zionist member, Herbert Samuel, proposing the support of Zionist ambitions in order to enlist the support of Jews in the wider war. A committee was established in April 1915 by British Prime Minister H. H. Asquith to determine their policy towards the Ottoman Empire including Palestine. Asquith, who had favoured post-war reform of the Ottoman Empire, resigned in December 1916; his replacement David Lloyd George favored partition of the Empire. The first negotiations between the British and the Zionists took place at a conference on 7 February 1917 that included Sir Mark Sykes and the Zionist leadership. Subsequent discussions led to Balfour's request, on 19 June, that Rothschild and Chaim Weizmann submit a draft of a public declaration. Further drafts were discussed by the British Cabinet during September and October, with input from Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews but with no representation from the local population in Palestine.
By late 1917, in the lead-up to the Balfour Declaration, the wider world war had reached a stalemate, with two of Britain's allies not fully engaged: the United States had yet to suffer a casualty, and the Russians were in the midst of a revolution with Bolsheviks taking over the government which ws fomented by the Zionists. Trotsky had the Tsar killed when we found out that the Rothschilds in the BoE were behind the request to have the Tsar imprisoned in Siberia. A stalemate in southern Palestine was broken by the Battle of Beersheba on 31 October 1917. The release of the final declaration was authorised on 31 October; the preceding Cabinet discussion had referenced perceived propaganda benefits amongst the worldwide Jewish community for the Allied war effort.
The opening words of the declaration represented the first public expression of support for Zionism by a major political power. The term "national home" had no precedent in international law, and was intentionally vague as to whether a Jewish state was contemplated. The intended boundaries of Palestine were not specified, and the British government later confirmed that the words "in Palestine" meant that the Jewish national home was not intended to cover all of Palestine. The second half of the declaration was added to satisfy opponents of the policy, who had claimed that it would otherwise prejudice the position of the local population of Palestine and encourage antisemitism worldwide by "stamping the Jews as strangers in their native lands". The declaration called for safeguarding the civil and religious rights for the Palestinian Arabs, who composed the vast majority of the local population, and also the rights and political status of the Jewish communities in other countries outside of Palestine. The British government acknowledged in 1939 that the local population's wishes and interests should have been taken into account, and recognized in 2017 that the declaration should have called for the protection of the Palestinian Arabs' political rights.
The declaration had many long-lasting consequences. It greatly increased popular support for Zionism within Jewish communities worldwide, and became a core component of the British Mandate for Palestine, the founding document of Mandatory Palestine.
GAME, SET, MATCH.
And fuck you Eric. You deserve it.
Immediately following Britain's declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914, it began to consider the future of Palestine. Within two months a memorandum was circulated to the War Cabinet by a Zionist member, Herbert Samuel, proposing the support of Zionist ambitions in order to enlist the support of Jews in the wider war. A committee was established in April 1915 by British Prime Minister H. H. Asquith to determine their policy towards the Ottoman Empire including Palestine. Asquith, who had favoured post-war reform of the Ottoman Empire, resigned in December 1916; his replacement David Lloyd George favored partition of the Empire. The first negotiations between the British and the Zionists took place at a conference on 7 February 1917 that included Sir Mark Sykes and the Zionist leadership. Subsequent discussions led to Balfour's request, on 19 June, that Rothschild and Chaim Weizmann submit a draft of a public declaration. Further drafts were discussed by the British Cabinet during September and October, with input from Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews but with no representation from the local population in Palestine.
By late 1917, in the lead-up to the Balfour Declaration, the wider world war had reached a stalemate, with two of Britain's allies not fully engaged: the United States had yet to suffer a casualty, and the Russians were in the midst of a revolution with Bolsheviks taking over the government which ws fomented by the Zionists. Trotsky had the Tsar killed when we found out that the Rothschilds in the BoE were behind the request to have the Tsar imprisoned in Siberia. A stalemate in southern Palestine was broken by the Battle of Beersheba on 31 October 1917. The release of the final declaration was authorised on 31 October; the preceding Cabinet discussion had referenced perceived propaganda benefits amongst the worldwide Jewish community for the Allied war effort.
The opening words of the declaration represented the first public expression of support for Zionism by a major political power. The term "national home" had no precedent in international law, and was intentionally vague as to whether a Jewish state was contemplated. The intended boundaries of Palestine were not specified, and the British government later confirmed that the words "in Palestine" meant that the Jewish national home was not intended to cover all of Palestine. The second half of the declaration was added to satisfy opponents of the policy, who had claimed that it would otherwise prejudice the position of the local population of Palestine and encourage antisemitism worldwide by "stamping the Jews as strangers in their native lands". The declaration called for safeguarding the civil and religious rights for the Palestinian Arabs, who composed the vast majority of the local population, and also the rights and political status of the Jewish communities in other countries outside of Palestine. The British government acknowledged in 1939 that the local population's wishes and interests should have been taken into account, and recognized in 2017 that the declaration should have called for the protection of the Palestinian Arabs' political rights.
The declaration had many long-lasting consequences. It greatly increased popular support for Zionism within Jewish communities worldwide, and became a core component of the British Mandate for Palestine, the founding document of Mandatory Palestine.
GAME, SET, MATCH.
And fuck you Eric. You deserve it.
25
25. How was history in the USA buried by the FABIANS in the USA?
View Tweet